Capturing the MidEast in short soundbites: poignant reflections by people who understand the complexities of the Middle East. My philosophy is: "less is more." You won't agree with everything that's here, but I'm confident you will find it interesting! Excepting the titles, my own comments are minimal. Instead I rely on news sources to string together what I hope is an interesting, politically challenging, non-partisan, non-ideological narrative.
Tuesday, March 06, 2012
Obama Pulls Back from his New Iran Policy
The video news clip above covers Monday's meeting between Netanyahu & Obama. Note that the President appears to be pulling back from his AIPAC speech where he stated:
"No Israeli government can tolerate a nuclear weapon in the hands of a regime that denies the Holocaust, threatens to wipe Israel off the map, and sponsors terrorist groups committed to Israel's destruction. A nuclear-armed Iran is completely counter to Israel's security interests. But it is also counter to the national security interests of the United States. Iran's leaders should have no doubt about the resolve of the United States. Just as they should not doubt Israel's sovereign right to make its own decisions about what is required to meet its security needs."
President Obama's new hawkish stance did not last long!
[Bruce]
*
UPDATES:
Obama: There'll be a price to pay for premature Iran strike -Hilary Leila Krieger
US President Barack Obama warned Tuesday that there would be consequences for the United States as well as Israel if a premature strike is launched on Iran.
“This is not just an issue of Israeli interests. This is an issue of American interests,” he said at a last-minute press conference. "It's also not just an issue of consequences for Israel if action is taken prematurely. There are consequences for the United States as well."
Obama’s comments come the day after he hosted Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu for three hours of talks devoted largely to Iran.
Following their meeting, Netanyahu gave an impassioned address to AIPAC, in which he repeatedly stressed Israel’s right to take whatever actions are necessary to defend itself and recalled that the US chose not to devote resources to destroying Auschwitz during World War II...
[Jerusalem Post]
Netanyahu: Israel has acted against US advice before -Herb Keinon
Citing historical precedents in which the US and Israel did not see eye-to-eye and Israel acted according to its own perception of its interests, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu told congressional leaders Tuesday that Israel viewed things differently than the US did at times, because it was not a global power and was more vulnerable.
Netanyahu, meeting congressional leaders before flying back to Israel Tuesday evening, noted that David Ben-Gurion declared independence against the advice of the US; Levi Eshkol launched a preemptive attack in 1967, against Washington’s counsel; and Menachem Begin decided to bomb the Iraqi nuclear reactor in 1981 despite US opposition.
[Jerusalem Post]
*
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
There are many persuasive arguments and historical precedent for Israel acting unilaterally. However, technology and world politics have changed in 30 and more years. It is not that Israel should not act, but what would be the cost for Israel and the world if the attack is a failure and Russia and China then decide to protect and arm Iran.
President Obama would be wise to spend his political chips differently. To publicly warm Israel on this issue is not a wise use of his words. It feeds the appearance of weakness from an Iranian eye view.
Post a Comment