Returning from Cyber Exile - Bruce
"Cyber exile" is a relatively new concept.
I never thought it would happen to me. I'm an "ideas" guy. I like debate and find the free flow of intellectual discourse to be one of the most enjoyable things about being alive. That, apparently, is no longer in vogue. That ideas are to be banned from the public square is a relatively new concept in the American psyche. It seems to have gained traction, as my experience attests to.
I've been associated with the National Havurah Committee [NHC] secondary to my membership in an affiliated congregation. Thus, I've been a relatively quiet member of their electronic listserv for many years. Periodically I would post an article I found interesting and thought others would find interesting as well.
(Note: a "listserv" is an electronic bulletin board/mailing list that distributes emails to subscribers. It is not unusual for organizations to use listservs to facilitate communication among its members.)
It's not that I didn't know most NHC listserv members were very liberal and left wing. Of course I did; some of them are my friends. It's that I severely underestimated how much the world has changed...how much ideas can be shunned. Or rather, I was to be shunned.
Jonathan Tobin has called this phenomenon "...the twenty first-century's version of Puritan New England's stocks where the public could mock and pelt offenders with garbage for violating community norms."
It began innocently enough on December 21st, 2016. I read, enjoyed and posted a piece I thought worthy of consideration on the National Havurah Committee listserv.
Even now the piece strikes me as intellectually sound and interesting. The scholarly article was called "Celebrating Orientalism" by Richard Landes. It was published in a journal called Middle East Quarterly [Winter 2017, Volume 23]. Click HERE to view the article.
In my email to the NHC listserv I introduced the article as follows:
Dear Cyberspiritualists, I just read a rather lengthy article, that lays out a fresh intellectual reframe for understanding the MidEast. Worth printing, reading and debating over Shabbat. Many on the left have a strong distaste for religious triumphalism...except when it comes to the religious triumphalism of Islam. This piece offers an analysis of that tendency and its dangers. For those averse to long pieces, allow me to tempt you with this gem: *"It took a millennium of constant and painful efforts for Western culture to learn how to sublimate man's libido dominandi to the point of creating a society tolerant of diversity, one that resolved disputes with a discourse of fairness rather than violence, and one where positive-sum encounters are a desired norm. To insist, as many liberals do, that this exceptional achievement be considered the default mode for mankind regardless of how far the "other" is from this cherished goal, and to exempt enemies of democracy from the civic responsibility of self-criticism even while redoubling its burden on oneself, is to undermine the freedoms Western civilization has built up over centuries."* See: http://www.meforum.org/6400/celebrating-orientalism Warmly, Bruce Xxxxxxxx :}
The avalanche that followed my post was not to be believed. In the hundreds of email postings that followed, I was accused of Islamophobia, racism, white supremacy, fascism and bigotry. It should be noted that many listserv members, even those disagreeing with the piece I posted, defended me.
Nonetheless, two days later I was removed from the listserv, receiving this simple notification banishing me to cyber-Siberia:
The Executive Committee of the NHC Board of Directors has decided to remove you from the NHC-DISCUSS listserv, as your most recent email is really not appropriate. We have all kinds of lively debates in our community, on everything from Israel politics to how to count a minyan, but we feel strongly that an NHC listserv cannot be used to disseminate Islamophobia or any other form of bigotry.
-Harpo Jxxxxx, Treasurer of the Board
There was enormous pressure on the NHC Board of Directors from the membership to reinstate me. Despite this pressure, it was almost a year before I was reinstated.
As I reflect on this experience, it is not hard to chalk this up to an increasingly polarized polity and a partisan divide that has worsened significantly over the last decade or so. Tolerance for opposing views is limited by an elevated sense of political correctness gone amok. The First Amendment, while still intact, has been socially chipped away at by accusations of "hate speech" that have been applied so liberally [no pun intended] as to be rendered almost meaningless.
As fate would have it, an early mentor of mine just died as I'm writing this. David McReynolds, a pacifist and long time socialist, was a friend and a strong influence on me in my 20's and early 30's. His New York Times obituary stated:
Mr. McReynolds resigned from the Socialist Party in 2015 after he was censured for comments he had made on social media. In one, he expressed concern over Islamist extremism following a terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo, a newspaper in Paris.
“The failure of the Socialist Party, its tendency to substitute a kind of left rhetoric for serious analysis, is to be regretted...,” Mr. McReynolds wrote after his resignation.
Source: New York Times [8/18/18]
Even David McReynolds, a morally centered soul from the left wing intelligentsia, could not escape politically correct cyber exile!“The failure of the Socialist Party, its tendency to substitute a kind of left rhetoric for serious analysis, is to be regretted...,” Mr. McReynolds wrote after his resignation.
Source: New York Times [8/18/18]
I don't mean to compare myself with such a great thinker as David McReynolds, but the irony is poignant.
I am sad to say that my cyber exile was quite effective. I no longer identify with the NHC community.
I am planning to leave the NHC listserv...this time voluntarily.
[Bruce's MidEast Soundbites]
*
2 comments:
I think the treatment you received is unfair. I read the article however, and think it was one-sided and narrow-minded. (BTW, it is not available on that site currently and I had to find it elsewhere). Nevertheless, a discourse takes place in many contexts and opposing views is one of them. I am not well versed in the organization or the way they conduct business to know if they had rules to uphold that created this situation, but on the face of it, I think you were treated poorly. We should rarely limit the flow of ideas, and I think it is particularly dangerous when liberal-leaning organizations do it, because it lowers them to the same level of the many conservative outlets. The danger of not sharing and discussing opposing views is that the readers begin to think what they read and believe are incontrovertible facts because clearly there are no opposing viewpoints worthy of inclusion and discussion. But in reality those sites don't want to deal with the public outcry you and the site were dealing with. But better to deal with the outcry then stifle discussion. While I didn't agree with the article, I always find you make well-thought-out arguments. And while we know I don't always agree with those arguments, I think the discussion is worth having and I have always found you able to discuss in a civil and respectful way. Which makes it even more unfortunate that they chose to handle the situation in the way they did. I can understand your displeasure with the way you were welcomed back and imagine it will be their loss when you leave again.
As always, thanks for your comments...and for pointing out that one of my links was not functional. I fixed it!
Post a Comment