Kadima's legacy of nothingness -Caroline GlickOlmert did not actually resign from office in the normal sense of the term. That is, he's not planning to leave office any time soon.
What Olmert did was force Israel into a long period of governmental instability.
[F]ar from leaving office anytime soon,
Olmert will remain in power at least three more months, and perhaps for as long as 10 months. [I]t is hard to see how his announcement served the national interest. If Olmert had wanted to do what is best for the country, then he would have announced that his resignation was effective immediately.
Kadima presented rejection of ideology as its chief selling point. By not being committed to either left-wing or right-wing ideals, they assured us that Kadima would always do the right thing for the country. But the opposite occurred.
Without the benefit of ideology to guide them, Kadima's leaders have been led
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c7ac/6c7ac4612e9306e699151fc9da5b1ed9940396a4" alt=""
by nothing more than their personal interests.
Kadima has tacked to the right and then to the left with no guiding rationale other than the morning's headlines, the weekend's opinion polls, and the threats of its coalition partners.
[A]ll of Israel's elections revolved around contrasting ideologies. For 29 years, voters were required to choose which side of the ideological divide they preferred. And making choices isn't easy. Both sides seem to have something to offer.Then Kadima entered the political stage and offered voters a way to avoid making a decision. It professed to be all things to all people.
[T]heir party has been nothing to all people.
[W]hen a government of nothings is running the show, nothing takes precedent over all things - even the most important things.
[Jerusalem Post]