People of goodwill can certainly disagree over how to handle Iraq, but human rights should be part of any responsible calculus. Unfortunately, some leaders continue to play down the gross violations in Iraq under Hussein's republic of fear, and ignore the potential for a human rights catastrophe should the United States withdraw.
[D]espite the carnage in Iraq, Iraqis are more optimistic about the future of their country than Americans are. In a face-to-face national poll of 5,019 people conducted by
Opinion Research, Iraqis said they preferred life under their new government, to life under the old tyranny. That is why, at a time when many Americans are abandoning the vision of a democratic Iraq, most Iraqis still cling to the hope of a better future. They know that under Hussein, there was no hope.
A precipitous withdrawal of U.S. forces could lead to a bloodbath that would make the current carnage pale by comparison. Without U.S. troops to quell some of the violence, Iranian-backed Shiite militias would dramatically increase their attacks on Sunnis; Sunni militias, backed by the Saudis or others, would retaliate in kind, drawing Iraq into full-blown civil war...
[T]he chaos could trigger similar clashes throughout the region as Sunni-Shiite tensions spill across Iraq's borders.
Perhaps the greatest irony [in] the debate over Iraq is that many of Bush's critics, who accused his administration of going blindly to war without considering what would happen once Hussein's regime was toppled, now blindly support a policy of withdrawing from Iraq without considering what might follow.
[Washington Post]